GOD & ELEMENTS

GOD & ELEMENTS

Share this post

GOD & ELEMENTS
GOD & ELEMENTS
Did Aristotle Fail in Physics? Part 7
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Did Aristotle Fail in Physics? Part 7

The Last of Premise B: an Eternally Cycling Cosmos

Nov 02, 2024
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

GOD & ELEMENTS
GOD & ELEMENTS
Did Aristotle Fail in Physics? Part 7
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
2
Share

As always, here’s the argument again from Part 1:

Premise A—>An organismic world view causes a failure in physics. (Part 2, 3)
Premise B—>Aristotle held an organismic world view. (Part 4, 5, 6, 7)
Therefore, Aristotle failed in physics. (Part 8)

This post is a review of Aristotle’s organismic world view, according to Jaki, as it relates to the doctrine of an eternally cycling universe.

Not in Relevance

Fr. Stanley Jaki does not mention the Greek idea of an eternally cycling cosmos or the Great Year in the Relevance of Physics, even as he attacks Aristotle’s organismic worldview as destructive to physics. He focuses on Aristotle’s two main assessments of the physical world in On the Heavens, for the celestial, and Meteorologica, for the terrestrial, pointing out examples of a priori explanations of physical processes as matching those of processes in living organisms. Relevance was published in 1966. Until now, I had not realized that Jaki did not mention eternal cycles in Relevance yet foc…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to GOD & ELEMENTS to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Stacy Trasancos
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More